One Or More Games
By J Hutcherson
WASHINGTON, DC (May 28, 2008) USSoccerPlayers -- Wouldn't it be nice if an item that made the quote sheet from last night's Houston - Dallas game was actually true. In response to a question asking about Dallas giving up late goals three times this season, interim coach Marco Ferruzzi replied: "It happened tonight, tonight's game stands on its own."
Uh no, to the eternal chagrin of everybody not interested in broader story lines or statistical modeling, it doesn't. That's why the schedule has multiple games listed. Well, unless you coach for FC Dallas were something that happened one afternoon got your predecessor fired.
Even taking Wednesday night in isolation, it's the same question. Dallas gives up a remarkably late goal that not only gives the Frisco faithful excitement courtesy of the away team, but keeps them from taking first place while waiting on the weekend results.
Continuity is the coach's friend because it lets them gloss over the off nights, disappointments, and problems at least when talking to the media. Yesterday's England - USA friendly for example. Bob Bradley fields a solid defense, but a questionable midfield and attack with no real leadership. National Team soccer isn't about picking an all-star team from whoever might be available and hoping they gel, but that's looking like the point in the Bradley era.
Take one game or several, and there's lack of development of role players that is significantly hampering the US. Setting aside the backup issues in defense when the European players aren't easily available, the midfield lacks the true successors to Claudio Reyna and Chris Armas while the strike partnership continues with odd pairings.
Yes, Josh Wolff and Eddie Johnson were together for a season in Kansas City, a year where they finished 5th in the East and missed the playoffs. Unless Bradley is trying to prove that Kansas City team squandered the future of the Nation Team, it's an odd choice to bring them back together two years later.
It's not the first with the strike partnership, with Landon Donovan also getting a selection of unsuited partners when he was being slotted into a forward role. Donovan remains the natural successor to the Reyna role, basically running the offense behind the forwards while capable of doing the same thing in transition to defense. It's a complement to a quality player. Established, it lets the other US skill players feel like they can make runs without exposing a weakness on the counter.
Staying with a 442 and getting two forwards to actually partner with each other shouldn't be this complicated. Big/little, young/old, poacher/runner... coaches have been doing this long enough for there to be basic templates. Chris Rolfe might have a future with the National Team, but not partnering Landon Donovan. Wolff and Johnson could be options, but not together.
England was basically John Terry, Steven Gerrard, and Jermain Defoe, with David Beckham getting ample opportunities and only factoring on one. Send in a team minus the bulk of the Chelsea and Manchester United contingent like they're taking to Trinidad & Tobago, and England becomes at best average by any standard.
Any coach can get caught up in using the usual suspects even when he's new and promising better days. Bradley doesn't have that because Reyna, Brian McBride, and Brad Friedel made themselves unavailable.
What Bradley hasn't done in turn is develop. Even Michael Bradley, the success story of the early going, is being played out of position with the National Team. The insistence on playing a true defensive midfielder when there are no international calibre defensive midfielders available leaves a skill player like Bradley with too much to do.
Build a better idea of a midfield, one that can play both ways without needing a designated player to link the defense, and the US turns a weakness. Bradley, DaMarcus Beasley, and Landon Donovan have all shown they're capable of defending. All of them can route the flow of the game towards the back four. All of them can attack effectively without overly exposing the counter. All of them can play a role at international level.
With Chicago, Bradley ran a 352 system because he had defenders, a defensive midfielder, and a keeper that could handle it, and later a skill player in DaMarcus Beasley who could run the wing at both ends for 90 minutes.
At international level, a three back set is begging for it. Trying to fake that with a converted defender in midfield or even a true defensive midfielder isn't as effective as loading up the back line. Stretching a defense to create space for crosses is on the short list of the obvious and early for any team. Nobody should be making that any easier.
Bradley knows that, and has gone against what worked for him in MLS. What he hasn't done yet is take the next step, figuring out what will work for him at National Team level.
Come on Hutch. We all know Bradley isn't responsible for little thinks like tactics or player development.
Posted by: Brian | May 29, 2008 at 02:45 PM
Right. He's there to kick ass and chew bubblegum, and he's got a whole lot of bubblegum.
Posted by: ### | May 29, 2008 at 04:41 PM
In defense of Bradley, he didn't know about Donovan until he showed up injured. That changes everything. England without Terry might very well have lost that game. He did as much keeping as James.
Posted by: Eric | May 29, 2008 at 05:36 PM
It's a little much to expect the leadership to hold Bradley to the fire. What ddo they know? Win or you're gone? Anybody is going to try to work that expectation down. How about, not quite so embarrassing? I'm sure he's reminding his bosses every day that he doesn't have McBride, Reyna, or Friedel.
Posted by: DXL | May 29, 2008 at 06:19 PM
You can't blame Bradley for the failure of support players to develop -- it's not his fault that prospects like Clark, Spector, Bornstein and even Feilhaber haven't stepped up. But Bradley gets full blame for giving so much playing time to has-beens (Bocanegra, Cherundolo), never-weres (Wolff) and never-will-bes (Pearce, Rolfe, Bornstein) instead of using those valuable minutes to blood young talent like Edu, Simek, Robbie Rogers, the now-healthy Kenny Cooper and some of the Latino kids now playing in Mexico.
And Hutcherson is flat wrong that Donovan's role should be running the offense behind the forwards. He doesn't hold the ball especially well in heavy traffic, and being in the center negates the impact of his blazing speed. He belongs outside on the right. Bradley and Feilhaber are both better candidates for the old Reyna role, but to me the eventual successor is clearly Adu.
Posted by: Mike | May 30, 2008 at 02:35 PM
Hey Mike.
The Mexico point is a solid one. The Donovan one not so much. Look at the runs he makes when he's playing comfortably. I don't have an issue with Bradley's defensive choices and I don't think there's enough depth to criticize them to this extent.
Thanks for taking the time for that level of critique.
Posted by: J Hutcherson | May 30, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I have to agree with Mike above me on Landon. He isn't much of a CM. All season long at the Galaxy he has played up top and excelled like never before in his career. If we are going to use J's premise of 'use what works for you in MLS' then you MUST but Landon up top.
Great call on Michael Bradley. I have been saying forever that they need to stop playing him like a true d-mid. His game is more suited toward the Micha Ballack model of CM. He doesn't hold the ball great and his tackling can be suspect at times. Those are primary jobs 1 and 2 of true d-mids. He shouldn't be doing it. If they insist on using a d-mid, you have to go with Edu. Of course is Soumare has his citizenship in order, they should call him up immediately. He can play d-mid or center back and is fantastic at both.
Too many things to work out (like giving Adu far more minutes as he is clearly the most dynamic player we have right now) but I do know the 'bucket' formation needs to die a much deserved death.
Posted by: papa bear | May 30, 2008 at 05:53 PM
LA isn't setting the high mark for center midfield as an attacking role and haven't since Cienfuegos. Good on you for turning it around on me though. Since he's playing club ball as a forward, he should be playing National Team soccer as a forward. Except he shouldn't be playing his club ball as a forward in an optimal situation. Take Houston's roster for instance. Still, good point.
Posted by: J Hutcherson | May 30, 2008 at 11:51 PM